The ‘Handshake’ Picture Taken Down at a Congressional Listening to

A congressional listening to on Tuesday was instantly and dramatically interrupted—by the chairwoman conducting it.

Her goal: Abort a Republican congressman’s try to current the very first picture of an individual who’s now 22 years outdated.

The scene was the Home subcommittee on oversight and investigations. The title of the listening to: “Roe Reversal: The Impacts of Taking Away the Constitutional Proper to an Abortion.”

Rep. Gary Palmer, R-Ala., started to ask a query of Dr. Christina Francis, the CEO-elect of the American Affiliation of Professional-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

“I need to present a poster,” Palmer stated to Francis, as a staffer behind him started to carry up {a photograph}. “That is world-renown. It has gone—”

A gavel slammed down ferociously on the entrance of the listening to room.

” … on all varieties of magazines—” Palmer tried to proceed.

“The gentleman will droop, and the employees will take down that image,” declared Chairwoman Diana DeGette, D-Colo.

“We’ll take it down,” Palmer stated calmly.

“On this committee,” she declared, “we admit paperwork and pictures on unanimous consent bases, and this has not been—”

“I settle for the chair’s ruling,” Palmer stated.

“Excuse me,” DeGette stated. “This has not been proven to the bulk and it has not been agreed to and there’s no basis, and we won’t permit it to be displayed and we won’t permit it to be submitted for the file.”

“I’m not shocked,” Palmer responded.

“That’s the ruling of the chair,” stated DeGette. “The gents is acknowledged.”

“I’m not shocked in any respect that you wouldn’t need to present this picture of an in-utero surgical procedure during which the kid being operated on grasps the finger of the physician doing the surgical procedure. That image was taken in 1999. And—”

See also  Nevada’s Vote-by-Mail System Is a Complete Catastrophe

“Having not seen the picture, I can’t remark as to what it’s,” DeGette stated. “The gents determined to not share it with the bulk.”

And DeGette, clearly, had determined to not let her subcommittee be used as a venue to share it with the world.

“OK,” Palmer stated to DeGette. “However the person within the picture is now 22 years outdated. His title is Sam.”

A fairly totally different scene—involving the identical {photograph}—had unfolded in a listening to 19 years in the past within the Senate subcommittee on science, know-how, and area.

On Sept. 25, 2003, the mom and father of the child who underwent the in-utero surgical procedure testified together with the photographer who had been employed by USA Right this moment to take images at that surgical procedure.

“In the course of the listening to right now, I wish to study a few of the most up-to-date advances within the fields in-utero surgical procedure and fetal medication,” then-Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., stated firstly of the listening to.

“By the fifteenth week of my being pregnant, our unborn son was recognized with spina bifida,” Julie Armas, the mom, testified on the listening to.

“In mild of this grim analysis, we had been informed that at the least half of all infants with spina bifida are aborted,” she stated. “However abortion was by no means an possibility for us.”

“After a lot prayer and help from household and pals, Samuel and I had maternal fetal surgical procedure at Vanderbilt on Aug. 19, 1999,” she stated. “I used to be 21 weeks pregnant, and he weighed a few pound.”

Michael Clancy, the photographer, defined to the subcommittee why he was within the surgical procedure that day and what he photographed there.

See also  Senate Listening to on Range in Diplomacy Fails to Get to Actual Questions

“As a veteran photojournalist in Nashville, Tennessee, I used to be employed by USA Right this moment to {photograph} a spina bifida corrective surgical procedure process,” he stated.

“The whole process would happen inside the uterus, and no a part of the kid was to breach the surgical opening,” Clancy informed the subcommittee.

“When it was over, the surgical crew breathed a sigh of aid, as did I,” he stated.

“Because the physician requested me what pace of movie I used to be utilizing,” he continued, “out of the nook of my eye I noticed the uterus shake, however nobody’s fingers had been close to it.

“It was shaking from inside,” he stated.

“Out of the blue, a complete arm thrust out of the opening and pulled again, till simply the little hand was exhibiting,” he stated.

“The physician reached over and lifted the hand, which reacted and squeezed the physician’s finger,” Clancy informed the subcommittee.

“As if testing for power, the physician shook the tiny fist. I took the image,” Clancy stated.

“It was 10 days earlier than I knew if the image was even in focus,” stated Clancy. “To make sure no digital manipulation of photos earlier than they see them, USA Right this moment requires that movie be submitted unprocessed.

“When the picture editor lastly phoned me,” Clancy informed the subcommittee, “he stated, ‘It’s essentially the most unbelievable image I’ve ever seen.’”

The picture printed within the committee’s report on this listening to—printed by the U.S. Authorities Printing Workplace—exhibits a tiny human hand extending via a lower within the mom’s uterus and seemingly greedy the gloved finger of a surgeon.

See also  Home Democrats to Lead FTX, Cryptocurrency Listening to

In a Could 2, 2000, story in USA Right this moment, that surgeon, Dr. Joseph Bruner, described the incident from a special perspective.

“Some opponents of abortion have claimed that the child reached via the womb and grabbed the physician’s hand,” USA Right this moment reported. “Not true, Bruner says.”

“The child didn’t attain out,” Bruner informed USA Right this moment. “The child was anesthetized. The child was not conscious of what was happening.”

“It was after the backbone had been repaired however earlier than the amniotic fluid was returned to the womb that Bruner lifted Samuel’s hand and the image was taken,” USA Right this moment reported. “Bruner says he noticed the hand ‘type of pop up within the incision’ on the womb, and he ‘reached over and picked it up.’”

“Why did I choose up the hand?” Bruner stated to USA Right this moment. “I don’t know why I did it. I seemed and I noticed this hand, and I suppose that to me it was only a very human factor to do to achieve and shake any individual’s hand.”

Greater than twenty years later, DeGette refused to let a photograph of this second be displayed at a listening to about abortion.


The Day by day Sign publishes quite a lot of views. Nothing written right here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Basis.

Have an opinion about this text? To hold forth, please electronic mail [email protected] and we’ll take into account publishing your edited remarks in our common “We Hear You” function. Bear in mind to incorporate the url or headline of the article plus your title and city and/or state.