‘It Wasn’t My Fault’: Trump Attracts Criticism For Blaming Midterm Losses on Hardcore Professional-Life Republicans

Former President Donald Trump, whose presidency arguably introduced in regards to the overturn of Roe v. Wade, is drawing criticism for blaming midterm losses on hardcore pro-life Republicans.

“It wasn’t my fault that the Republicans didn’t reside as much as expectations within the MidTerms,” the previous president stated in a TruthSocial publish on Sunday. “I used to be 233-20! It was the ‘abortion challenge,’ poorly dealt with by many Republicans, particularly those who firmly insisted on No Exceptions, even within the case of Rape, Incest, or Lifetime of the Mom, that misplaced massive numbers of Voters.”

“Additionally,” Trump added, “the folks that pushed so arduous, for many years, towards abortion, received their want from the U.S. Supreme Court docket, & simply plain disappeared, to not be seen once more. Plus, Mitch silly $’s!”

As president, Trump appointed Supreme Court docket justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, all of whom voted with the bulk within the Dobbs choice, which overturned Roe v. Wade.

The previous president’s remarks shortly sparked a backlash as conservatives identified that Trump, months after a large pro-life win, was seemingly attacking a gaggle of voters who staunchly supported him till now.

“Professional-lifers have been an indispensable a part of the Trump coalition that got here out in droves due to his daring pro-life message in 2016,” stated Roger Severino, vice chairman of home coverage on the Heritage Basis (The Every day Sign is the information outlet of The Heritage Basis).

“Candidates who adopted that instance in 2020 gained, those that ran away, like [Pennsylvania GOP Senate candidate] Dr. [Mehmet] Oz, misplaced,” he added. “Whoever is now advising President Trump on the contrary on life points ought to be fired instantly.”

See also  DeSantis Touts Florida’s Successes, Paints Stark Distinction With Blue States

“Assume how silly it’s for Trump to run left on the pro-life challenge,” stated The Spectator’s Ben Domenech. “That is the most important win of his presidency. Large vested goodwill from pro-lifers. And what does he do? Name them quislings and say they’re too radical! Very dumb.”

Democratic California Rep. Ted Lieu accused Trump of by no means believing that life started at conception.

“He was utilizing the abortion challenge solely to achieve energy,” Lieu claimed. “Now that you simply’re not helpful to him, Trump blames you for shedding and needs you to close up. In case you nonetheless assist him, you’re disrespecting your self.”

Nationwide Assessment editor Ramesh Ponnuru referred to as Trump’s comment “a pile of nonsense atop a kernel of fact,” noting that whereas some Republican candidates took the abortion place described by Trump (equivalent to Michigan candidate Tudor Dixon) all of those candidates “had Trump’s backing” — undercutting “his means to run away from the defeats of 2022.”

“He selected candidates primarily based on their loyalty to him, not their means to win their races,” wrote Ponnuru. “His loyalty take a look at tended to display screen out candidates who have been higher suited to win aggressive states (e.g., Doug Ducey in Arizona, who backs the usual exceptions to an abortion ban).”

The previous president’s musings prompted Susan B. Anthony Professional-Life America to challenge a press release noting that the “the method to profitable on abortion in federal races, confirmed for a decade is that this: state clearly the formidable consensus pro-life place and distinction that with the intense view of Democrat opponents.”

“We stay up for listening to that place totally articulated by Mr. Trump and all presidential candidates,” the group stated, including, “There was ALSO a profound midterm lesson for future federal candidates: those that adopted the Ostrich Technique on abortion lose.”

Former Vice President Mike Pence applauded this stance, tweeting, “Properly stated!” on Monday night.

The professional-life group’s assertion echoes its messaging from November. In a memo following election night time, the group stated: “There’s little question that the Dobbs choice was a political earthquake – creating a novel alternative for Democrats to encourage their depressed base and giving them the most effective alternative they’ll ever have to make use of the problem politically.”

“The important thing takeaway from final night time is evident,” the memo continued, “GOP pro-life candidates win in aggressive races in the event that they outline their opponents as abortion extremists who assist abortion on demand with NO limits, and distinction that with a clearly outlined pro-life place centered round consensus equivalent to pain-capable or heartbeat limits.”

The 2024 election should be in regards to the GOP happening offense on abortion, the SBA Professional-Life America memo stated.

This contains “exposing President Biden and the Democrats because the true extremists who don’t assist ANY limits on abortion and contrasting it with a robust GOP pro-life agenda centered on nationwide minimal protections for the unborn youngster and moms both on the level during which they really feel ache or when their heartbeat may be detected.”

“GOP main candidates could have completely different views on what’s achievable, and we welcome that debate – and much more so welcome the controversy within the common election setting.”

Susan B. Anthony Professional-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser pointed to Oz for instance of a candidate who failed, partially, to his refusal to place on abortion in a “mature, deliberative, and principled method,” throughout a press name following the midterms.

“Candidates who conversely undertake the ostrich technique, which is placing their head within the sand and hoping the truth goes away, or the possum technique, which is to fake lifeless and hope no person notices your physique is mendacity there, they lose,” Dannenfelser stated. “And I feel that our candidate in Pennsylvania is an instance.”

“We win after we take a place that’s standard and clear and assured, and we distinction that place with our opponents,” Dannenfelser added on the time. “And on this atmosphere, that may be a distinction that wins as a result of our standard place again and again contrasts effectively with 100% abortion up till the tip, paid for by taxpayers.”

Have an opinion about this text? To hold forth, please e-mail [email protected] and we’ll think about publishing your edited remarks in our common “We Hear You” characteristic. Keep in mind to incorporate the url or headline of the article plus your identify and city and/or state.